↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Conversational Flow Promotes Solidarity

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
8 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Conversational Flow Promotes Solidarity
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0078363
Pubmed ID
Authors

Namkje Koudenburg, Tom Postmes, Ernestine H. Gordijn

Abstract

Social interaction is fundamental to the development of various aspects of "we-ness". Previous research has focused on the role the content of interaction plays in establishing feelings of unity, belongingness and shared reality (a cluster of variables referred to as solidarity here). The present paper is less concerned with content, but focuses on the form of social interaction. We propose that the degree to which conversations flow smoothly or not is, of itself, a cue to solidarity. We test this hypothesis in samples of unacquainted and acquainted dyads who communicate via headsets. Conversational flow is disrupted by introducing a delay in the auditory feedback (vs. no delay). Results of three studies show that smoothly coordinated conversations (compared with disrupted conversations and a control condition) increase feelings of belonging and perceptions of group entitativity, independently of conversation content. These effects are driven by the subjective experience of conversational flow. Our data suggest that this process occurs largely beyond individuals' control. We conclude that the form of social interaction is a powerful cue for inferring group solidarity. Implications for the impact of modern communication technology on developing a shared social identity are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Luxembourg 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 29%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 50%
Social Sciences 7 13%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Computer Science 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 8 15%