↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Alzheimer's Disease Risk Assessment Using Large-Scale Machine Learning Methods

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Alzheimer's Disease Risk Assessment Using Large-Scale Machine Learning Methods
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0077949
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramon Casanova, Fang-Chi Hsu, Kaycee M. Sink, Stephen R. Rapp, Jeff D. Williamson, Susan M. Resnick, Mark A. Espeland

Abstract

The goal of this work is to introduce new metrics to assess risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) which we call AD Pattern Similarity (AD-PS) scores. These metrics are the conditional probabilities modeled by large-scale regularized logistic regression. The AD-PS scores derived from structural MRI and cognitive test data were tested across different situations using data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study. The scores were computed across groups of participants stratified by cognitive status, age and functional status. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate associations with the distribution of conversion times from mild cognitive impairment to AD. The performances of classifiers developed using data from different types of brain tissue were systematically characterized across cognitive status groups. We also explored the performance of anatomical and cognitive-anatomical composite scores generated by combining the outputs of classifiers developed using different types of data. In addition, we provide the AD-PS scores performance relative to other metrics used in the field including the Spatial Pattern of Abnormalities for Recognition of Early AD (SPARE-AD) index and total hippocampal volume for the variables examined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 167 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 20%
Researcher 32 19%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Student > Bachelor 7 4%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 38 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 29 17%
Engineering 21 12%
Neuroscience 17 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 9%
Psychology 9 5%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 52 30%