↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Network Structure and Travel Time Perception

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Network Structure and Travel Time Perception
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0077718
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pavithra Parthasarathi, David Levinson, Hartwig Hochmair

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to test the systematic variation in the perception of travel time among travelers and relate the variation to the underlying street network structure. Travel survey data from the Twin Cities metropolitan area (which includes the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul) is used for the analysis. Travelers are classified into two groups based on the ratio of perceived and estimated commute travel time. The measures of network structure are estimated using the street network along the identified commute route. T-test comparisons are conducted to identify statistically significant differences in estimated network measures between the two traveler groups. The combined effect of these estimated network measures on travel time is then analyzed using regression models. The results from the t-test and regression analyses confirm the influence of the underlying network structure on the perception of travel time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 94 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 37%
Student > Master 21 21%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 44 44%
Social Sciences 14 14%
Computer Science 6 6%
Design 4 4%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 19 19%