↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

New Oral Anticoagulants Are Not Superior to Warfarin in Secondary Prevention of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attacks, but Lower the Risk of Intracranial Bleeding: Insights from a Meta-Analysis and…

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
New Oral Anticoagulants Are Not Superior to Warfarin in Secondary Prevention of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attacks, but Lower the Risk of Intracranial Bleeding: Insights from a Meta-Analysis and Indirect Treatment Comparisons
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0077694
Pubmed ID
Authors

Partha Sardar, Saurav Chatterjee, Wen-Chih Wu, Edgar Lichstein, Joydeep Ghosh, Shamik Aikat, Debabrata Mukherjee

Abstract

Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and prior stroke are classified as high risk in all risk stratification schemes. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of New Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) to warfarin in patients with AF and previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 152 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 15%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Other 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Other 37 24%
Unknown 32 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 37 24%