Title |
Validity of Sealant Retention as Surrogate for Caries Prevention – A Systematic Review
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0077103 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Steffen Mickenautsch, Veerasamy Yengopal |
Abstract |
To appraise the clinical literature in determining whether loss of complete sealant retention as surrogate endpoint is directly associated with caries occurrence on sealed teeth as its clinical endpoint and to apply the appraised evidence in testing the null-hypothesis that the retention/caries ratio between different types of sealant materials (resin and glass-ionomer cement) is not statistically significant (= Prentice criterion for surrogate endpoint validity). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 94 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
Researcher | 6 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 18% |
Unknown | 26 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 59% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 31 | 32% |