↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Validity of Sealant Retention as Surrogate for Caries Prevention – A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Validity of Sealant Retention as Surrogate for Caries Prevention – A Systematic Review
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0077103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steffen Mickenautsch, Veerasamy Yengopal

Abstract

To appraise the clinical literature in determining whether loss of complete sealant retention as surrogate endpoint is directly associated with caries occurrence on sealed teeth as its clinical endpoint and to apply the appraised evidence in testing the null-hypothesis that the retention/caries ratio between different types of sealant materials (resin and glass-ionomer cement) is not statistically significant (= Prentice criterion for surrogate endpoint validity).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 94 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 20%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 31 32%