Title |
Is Physiological Performance a Good Predictor for Fitness? Insights from an Invasive Plant Species
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0076432 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marco A. Molina-Montenegro, Cristian Salgado-Luarte, Rómulo Oses, Cristian Torres-Díaz |
Abstract |
Is physiological performance a suitable proxy of fitness in plants? Although, several studies have been conducted to measure some fitness-related traits and physiological performance, direct assessments are seldom found in the literature. Here, we assessed the physiology-fitness relationship using second-generation individuals of the invasive plant species Taraxacum officinale from 17 localities distributed in five continents. Specifically, we tested if i) the maximum quantum yield is a good predictor for seed-output ii) whether this physiology-fitness relationship can be modified by environmental heterogeneity, and iii) if this relationship has an adaptive consequence for T. officinale individuals from different localities. Overall, we found a significant positive relationship between the maximum quantum yield and fitness for all localities evaluated, but this relationship decreased in T. officinale individuals from localities with greater environmental heterogeneity. Finally, we found that those individuals from localities where environmental conditions are highly seasonal performed better under heterogeneous environmental conditions. Contrarily, under homogeneous controlled conditions, those individuals from localities with low environmental seasonality performed much better. In conclusion, our results suggest that the maximum quantum yield seem to be good predictors for plant fitness. We suggest that rapid measurements, such as those obtained from the maximum quantum yield, could provide a straightforward proxy of individual's fitness in changing environments. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 61 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 24% |
Student > Master | 12 | 19% |
Researcher | 11 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
Professor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 15% |
Unknown | 9 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 39% |
Environmental Science | 11 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 10% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 10 | 16% |