↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Different Responses to Reward Comparisons by Three Primate Species

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Different Responses to Reward Comparisons by Three Primate Species
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0076297
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hani D. Freeman, Jennifer Sullivan, Lydia M. Hopper, Catherine F. Talbot, Andrea N. Holmes, Nancy Schultz-Darken, Lawrence E. Williams, Sarah F. Brosnan

Abstract

Recently, much attention has been paid to the role of cooperative breeding in the evolution of behavior. In many measures, cooperative breeders are more prosocial than non-cooperatively breeding species, including being more likely to actively share food. This is hypothesized to be due to selective pressures specific to the interdependency characteristic of cooperatively breeding species. Given the high costs of finding a new mate, it has been proposed that cooperative breeders, unlike primates that cooperate in other contexts, should not respond negatively to unequal outcomes between themselves and their partner. However, in this context such pressures may extend beyond cooperative breeders to other species with pair-bonding and bi-parental care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 15 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 23%
Psychology 11 18%
Environmental Science 6 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 18 29%