↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Patterns of Frailty in Older Adults: Comparing Results from Higher and Lower Income Countries Using the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) and the Study on Global AGEing and…

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Patterns of Frailty in Older Adults: Comparing Results from Higher and Lower Income Countries Using the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) and the Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health (SAGE)
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0075847
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth Harttgen, Paul Kowal, Holger Strulik, Somnath Chatterji, Sebastian Vollmer

Abstract

We use the method of deficit accumulation to describe prevalent and incident levels of frailty in community-dwelling older persons and compare prevalence rates in higher income countries in Europe, to prevalence rates in six lower income countries. Two multi-country data collection efforts, SHARE and SAGE, provide nationally representative samples of adults aged 50 years and older. Forty items were used to construct the frailty index in each data set. Our study shows that the level of frailty was distributed along the socioeconomic gradient in both higher and lower income countries such that those individuals with less education and income were more likely to be frail. Frailty increased with age and women were more likely to be frail in most countries. Across samples we find that the level of frailty was higher in the higher income countries than in the lower income countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Unknown 128 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 32 25%
Unknown 29 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 12%
Social Sciences 15 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 34 26%