↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

E-Readers Are More Effective than Paper for Some with Dyslexia

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
26 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
200 X users
facebook
25 Facebook pages
googleplus
15 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
E-Readers Are More Effective than Paper for Some with Dyslexia
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0075634
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew H. Schneps, Jenny M. Thomson, Chen Chen, Gerhard Sonnert, Marc Pomplun

Abstract

E-readers are fast rivaling print as a dominant method for reading. Because they offer accessibility options that are impossible in print, they are potentially beneficial for those with impairments, such as dyslexia. Yet, little is known about how the use of these devices influences reading in those who struggle. Here, we observe reading comprehension and speed in 103 high school students with dyslexia. Reading on paper was compared with reading on a small handheld e-reader device, formatted to display few words per line. We found that use of the device significantly improved speed and comprehension, when compared with traditional presentations on paper for specific subsets of these individuals: Those who struggled most with phoneme decoding or efficient sight word reading read more rapidly using the device, and those with limited VA Spans gained in comprehension. Prior eye tracking studies demonstrated that short lines facilitate reading in dyslexia, suggesting that it is the use of short lines (and not the device per se) that leads to the observed benefits. We propose that these findings may be understood as a consequence of visual attention deficits, in some with dyslexia, that make it difficult to allocate attention to uncrowded text near fixation, as the gaze advances during reading. Short lines ameliorate this by guiding attention to the uncrowded span.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 200 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 233 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Other 57 23%
Unknown 42 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 22%
Social Sciences 44 18%
Computer Science 26 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 6%
Arts and Humanities 11 4%
Other 45 18%
Unknown 54 22%