Title |
Preferred Habitat of Breeding Birds May Be Compromised by Climate Change: Unexpected Effects of an Exceptionally Cold, Wet Spring
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0075536 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael J. Whitehouse, Nancy M. Harrison, Julia Mackenzie, Shelley A. Hinsley |
Abstract |
Previous studies of the consequences for breeding birds of climate change have explored how their populations may respond to increasing temperatures. However, few have considered the likely outcome of predicted extreme conditions and the relative vulnerability of populations in different habitats. Here, we compare phenology and breeding success in great tits and blue tits over a 10 year period, including the extremely harsh conditions during spring 2012, at three sites in eastern England--mixed deciduous woodland, riparian and urban habitat. Production, measured as brood biomass, was significantly lower in 2012 compared with the previous 9 years, with the decrease in productivity relatively greatest in woodland habitat. Production was related to hatch delay, i.e. birds not initiating incubation immediately after clutch completion, which was more common in 2012 than in previous years. The best predictor of hatch delay was daytime temperature (not nighttime minimum temperature) and rainfall, which convincingly reflected low growth and activity of caterpillar prey. We found that birds breeding in riparian and urban habitats were less vulnerable to the extremes of weather than those breeding in mixed deciduous woodland. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
Spain | 4 | 14% |
Hungary | 3 | 11% |
Canada | 2 | 7% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 24 | 86% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 87 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 22% |
Researcher | 16 | 17% |
Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 46% |
Environmental Science | 21 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 18 | 20% |