↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Potential Stream Density in Mid-Atlantic U.S. Watersheds

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Potential Stream Density in Mid-Atlantic U.S. Watersheds
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0074819
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew J. Elmore, Jason P. Julian, Steven M. Guinn, Matthew C. Fitzpatrick

Abstract

Stream network density exerts a strong influence on ecohydrologic processes in watersheds, yet existing stream maps fail to capture most headwater streams and therefore underestimate stream density. Furthermore, discrepancies between mapped and actual stream length vary between watersheds, confounding efforts to understand the impacts of land use on stream ecosystems. Here we report on research that predicts stream presence from coupled field observations of headwater stream channels and terrain variables that were calculated both locally and as an average across the watershed upstream of any location on the landscape. Our approach used maximum entropy modeling (MaxEnt), a robust method commonly implemented to model species distributions that requires information only on the presence of the entity of interest. In validation, the method correctly predicts the presence of 86% of all 10-m stream segments and errors are low (<1%) for catchments larger than 10 ha. We apply this model to the entire Potomac River watershed (37,800 km(2)) and several adjacent watersheds to map stream density and compare our results with the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD). We find that NHD underestimates stream density by up to 250%, with errors being greatest in the densely urbanized cities of Washington, DC and Baltimore, MD and in regions where the NHD has never been updated from its original, coarse-grain mapping. This work is the most ambitious attempt yet to map stream networks over a large region and will have lasting implications for modeling and conservation efforts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Professor 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 27 39%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 11%
Engineering 6 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 10 14%