↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Fashion vs. Function in Cultural Evolution: The Case of Dog Breed Popularity

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
158 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
71 X users
facebook
17 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
Title
Fashion vs. Function in Cultural Evolution: The Case of Dog Breed Popularity
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0074770
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Ghirlanda, Alberto Acerbi, Harold Herzog, James A. Serpell

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between characteristics of dog breeds and their popularity between years 1926 and 2005. We consider breed health, longevity, and behavioral qualities such as aggressiveness, trainability, and fearfulness. We show that a breed's overall popularity, fluctuations in popularity, and rates of increase and decrease around popularity peaks show typically no correlation with these breed characteristics. One exception is the finding that more popular breeds tend to suffer from more inherited disorders. Our results support the hypothesis that dog breed popularity has been primarily determined by fashion rather than function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 182 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Student > Master 24 13%
Researcher 18 10%
Other 12 6%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 38 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 29 15%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Psychology 12 6%
Environmental Science 7 4%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 51 27%