↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Children's Computation of Complex Linguistic Forms: A Study of Frequency and Imageability Effects

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
11 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Children's Computation of Complex Linguistic Forms: A Study of Frequency and Imageability Effects
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0074683
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina D. Dye, Matthew Walenski, Elizabeth L. Prado, Stewart Mostofsky, Michael T. Ullman

Abstract

This study investigates the storage vs. composition of inflected forms in typically-developing children. Children aged 8-12 were tested on the production of regular and irregular past-tense forms. Storage (vs. composition) was examined by probing for past-tense frequency effects and imageability effects--both of which are diagnostic tests for storage--while controlling for a number of confounding factors. We also examined sex as a factor. Irregular inflected forms, which must depend on stored representations, always showed evidence of storage (frequency and/or imageability effects), not only across all children, but also separately in both sexes. In contrast, for regular forms, which could be either stored or composed, only girls showed evidence of storage. This pattern is similar to that found in previously-acquired adult data from the same task, with the notable exception that development affects which factors influence the storage of regulars in females: imageability plays a larger role in girls, and frequency in women. Overall, the results suggest that irregular inflected forms are always stored (in children and adults, and in both sexes), whereas regulars can be either composed or stored, with their storage a function of various item- and subject-level factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 36 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Lecturer 3 8%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 15 38%
Psychology 5 13%
Social Sciences 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 8 20%