↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Categorical Dimensions of Human Odor Descriptor Space Revealed by Non-Negative Matrix Factorization

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
Title
Categorical Dimensions of Human Odor Descriptor Space Revealed by Non-Negative Matrix Factorization
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0073289
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason B. Castro, Arvind Ramanathan, Chakra S. Chennubhotla

Abstract

In contrast to most other sensory modalities, the basic perceptual dimensions of olfaction remain unclear. Here, we use non-negative matrix factorization (NMF)--a dimensionality reduction technique--to uncover structure in a panel of odor profiles, with each odor defined as a point in multi-dimensional descriptor space. The properties of NMF are favorable for the analysis of such lexical and perceptual data, and lead to a high-dimensional account of odor space. We further provide evidence that odor dimensions apply categorically. That is, odor space is not occupied homogenously, but rather in a discrete and intrinsically clustered manner. We discuss the potential implications of these results for the neural coding of odors, as well as for developing classifiers on larger datasets that may be useful for predicting perceptual qualities from chemical structures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 2%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 192 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 16%
Student > Master 28 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 5%
Other 42 20%
Unknown 35 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 19%
Computer Science 22 11%
Psychology 15 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 6%
Engineering 13 6%
Other 60 29%
Unknown 45 22%