↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Cost-Effectiveness of Tdap Vaccination of Adults Aged ≥65 Years in the Prevention of Pertussis in the US: A Dynamic Model of Disease Transmission

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Cost-Effectiveness of Tdap Vaccination of Adults Aged ≥65 Years in the Prevention of Pertussis in the US: A Dynamic Model of Disease Transmission
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0072723
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa J. McGarry, Girishanthy Krishnarajah, Gregory Hill, Cristina Masseria, Michelle Skornicki, Narin Pruttivarasin, Bhakti Arondekar, Julie Roiz, Stephen I. Pelton, Milton C. Weinstein

Abstract

In February 2012, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) advised that all adults aged ≥65 years receive a single dose of reduced-antigen-content tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap), expanding on a 2010 recommendation for adults >65 that was limited to those with close contact with infants. We evaluated clinical and economic outcomes of adding Tdap booster of adults aged ≥65 to "baseline" practice [full-strength DTaP administered from 2 months to 4-6 years, and one dose of Tdap at 11-64 years replacing decennial Td booster], using a dynamic model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Estonia 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 47 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Psychology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 15 29%