↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Are Bisphosphonates Effective in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis Pain? A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
16 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Are Bisphosphonates Effective in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis Pain? A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0072714
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison J. Davis, Toby O. Smith, Caroline B. Hing, Nidhi Sofat

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis worldwide. Pain and reduced function are the main symptoms in this prevalent disease. There are currently no treatments for OA that modify disease progression; therefore analgesic drugs and joint replacement for larger joints are the standard of care. In light of several recent studies reporting the use of bisphosphonates for OA treatment, our work aimed to evaluate published literature to assess the effectiveness of bisphosphonates in OA treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 7 6%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 36 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 43 38%