↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Long-Term Effects of Statin Treatment in Elderly People: Extended Follow-Up of the PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER)

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Long-Term Effects of Statin Treatment in Elderly People: Extended Follow-Up of the PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER)
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0072642
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanne M. Lloyd, David J. Stott, Anton J. M. de Craen, Patricia M. Kearney, Naveed Sattar, Ivan Perry, Christopher J. Packard, Andrew Briggs, Laura Marchbank, Harry Comber, J. Wouter Jukema, Rudi G. J. Westendorp, Stella Trompet, Brendan M. Buckley, Ian Ford

Abstract

The PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER), a placebo-controlled trial of pravastatin, demonstrated a 19% reduction in coronary outcomes (p=0.006) after a mean of 3.2 years, with no impact on stroke outcomes or all-cause mortality. However, there was a suggestion of increased cancer risk. Our aim is to determine the long-term benefits and safety of pravastatin treatment in older people using post-trial follow-up of the PROSPER participants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 71 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 49%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 20 27%