↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

I Choose, Therefore I Like: Preference for Faces Induced by Arbitrary Choice

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
I Choose, Therefore I Like: Preference for Faces Induced by Arbitrary Choice
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0072071
Pubmed ID
Authors

Koyo Nakamura, Hideaki Kawabata

Abstract

Behavioral choice alters one's preference rather than simply reflecting it. This effect to fit preferences with past choice, is known as "choice-induced preference change." After making a choice between two equally attractive options, one tends to rate the chosen option better than they initially did and/or the unchosen option worse. The present study examined how behavioral choice changes subsequent preference, using facial images for the choice options as well as blind choice techniques. Participants rated their facial preference for each face, and chose between two equally preferred faces and subsequently rated their facial preference. Results from four experiments demonstrated that randomly chosen faces were more preferred only after participants were required to choose "a preferred face," (in Experiment 1) but not "an unpreferred face," (in Experiment 2) or "a rounder face" (in Experiment 3). Further, preference change was still observed after participants were informed that choices were actually random (in Experiment 4). Our findings provide new and important implications characterizing the conditions under which random choice changes preference, and show that people are tempted to make a biased evaluation even after they know that they did not make the choice for themselves.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
France 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Luxembourg 1 2%
Unknown 49 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 22%
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 42%
Neuroscience 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 12 22%