↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Quantifying Beetle-Mediated Effects on Gas Fluxes from Dung Pats

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
23 X users
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Quantifying Beetle-Mediated Effects on Gas Fluxes from Dung Pats
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0071454
Pubmed ID
Authors

Atte Penttilä, Eleanor M. Slade, Asko Simojoki, Terhi Riutta, Kari Minkkinen, Tomas Roslin

Abstract

Agriculture is one of the largest contributors of the anthropogenic greenhouse gases (GHGs) responsible for global warming. Measurements of gas fluxes from dung pats suggest that dung is a source of GHGs, but whether these emissions are modified by arthropods has not been studied. A closed chamber system was used to measure the fluxes of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) from dung pats with and without dung beetles on a grass sward. The presence of dung beetles significantly affected the fluxes of GHGs from dung pats. Most importantly, fresh dung pats emitted higher amounts of CO2 and lower amounts of CH4 per day in the presence than absence of beetles. Emissions of N2O showed a distinct peak three weeks after the start of the experiment--a pattern detected only in the presence of beetles. When summed over the main grazing season (June-July), total emissions of CH4 proved significantly lower, and total emissions of N2O significantly higher in the presence than absence of beetles. While clearly conditional on the experimental conditions, the patterns observed here reveal a potential impact of dung beetles on gas fluxes realized at a small spatial scale, and thereby suggest that arthropods may have an overall effect on gas fluxes from agriculture. Dissecting the exact mechanisms behind these effects, mapping out the range of conditions under which they occur, and quantifying effect sizes under variable environmental conditions emerge as key priorities for further research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 4%
Brazil 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 127 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 40%
Environmental Science 23 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 30 22%