↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Entitymetrics: Measuring the Impact of Entities

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Entitymetrics: Measuring the Impact of Entities
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0071416
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Ding, Min Song, Jia Han, Qi Yu, Erjia Yan, Lili Lin, Tamy Chambers

Abstract

This paper proposes entitymetrics to measure the impact of knowledge units. Entitymetrics highlight the importance of entities embedded in scientific literature for further knowledge discovery. In this paper, we use Metformin, a drug for diabetes, as an example to form an entity-entity citation network based on literature related to Metformin. We then calculate the network features and compare the centrality ranks of biological entities with results from Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD). The comparison demonstrates the usefulness of entitymetrics to detect most of the outstanding interactions manually curated in CTD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Spain 2 2%
Mexico 2 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 94 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 22%
Student > Master 12 11%
Librarian 9 8%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 25 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 29 27%
Social Sciences 18 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 27 25%