↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Shorter Lines Facilitate Reading in Those Who Struggle

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
21 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
Shorter Lines Facilitate Reading in Those Who Struggle
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0071161
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew H. Schneps, Jenny M. Thomson, Gerhard Sonnert, Marc Pomplun, Chen Chen, Amanda Heffner-Wong

Abstract

People with dyslexia, who ordinarily struggle to read, sometimes remark that reading is easier when e-readers are used. Here, we used eye tracking to observe high school students with dyslexia as they read using these devices. Among the factors investigated, we found that reading using a small device resulted in substantial benefits, improving reading speeds by 27%, reducing the number of fixations by 11%, and importantly, reducing the number of regressive saccades by more than a factor of 2, with no cost to comprehension. Given that an expected trade-off between horizontal and vertical regression was not observed when line lengths were altered, we speculate that these effects occur because sluggish attention spreads perception to the left as the gaze shifts during reading. Short lines eliminate crowded text to the left, reducing regression. The effects of attention modulation by the hand, and of increased letter spacing to reduce crowding, were also found to modulate the oculomotor dynamics in reading, but whether these factors resulted in benefits or costs depended on characteristics, such as visual attention span, that varied within our sample.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 176 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 19%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 41 22%
Unknown 27 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 52 28%
Social Sciences 24 13%
Computer Science 17 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 6%
Linguistics 10 5%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 32 17%