↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Deep-Sea Benthic Footprint of the Deepwater Horizon Blowout

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
42 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
34 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
Title
Deep-Sea Benthic Footprint of the Deepwater Horizon Blowout
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0070540
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul A. Montagna, Jeffrey G. Baguley, Cynthia Cooksey, Ian Hartwell, Larry J. Hyde, Jeffrey L. Hyland, Richard D. Kalke, Laura M. Kracker, Michael Reuscher, Adelaide C. E. Rhodes

Abstract

The Deepwater Horizon (DWH) accident in the northern Gulf of Mexico occurred on April 20, 2010 at a water depth of 1525 meters, and a deep-sea plume was detected within one month. Oil contacted and persisted in parts of the bottom of the deep-sea in the Gulf of Mexico. As part of the response to the accident, monitoring cruises were deployed in fall 2010 to measure potential impacts on the two main soft-bottom benthic invertebrate groups: macrofauna and meiofauna. Sediment was collected using a multicorer so that samples for chemical, physical and biological analyses could be taken simultaneously and analyzed using multivariate methods. The footprint of the oil spill was identified by creating a new variable with principal components analysis where the first factor was indicative of the oil spill impacts and this new variable mapped in a geographic information system to identify the area of the oil spill footprint. The most severe relative reduction of faunal abundance and diversity extended to 3 km from the wellhead in all directions covering an area about 24 km(2). Moderate impacts were observed up to 17 km towards the southwest and 8.5 km towards the northeast of the wellhead, covering an area 148 km(2). Benthic effects were correlated to total petroleum hydrocarbon, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and barium concentrations, and distance to the wellhead; but not distance to hydrocarbon seeps. Thus, benthic effects are more likely due to the oil spill, and not natural hydrocarbon seepage. Recovery rates in the deep sea are likely to be slow, on the order of decades or longer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 274 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 63 22%
Student > Master 50 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 14%
Student > Bachelor 38 13%
Other 16 6%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 43 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 33%
Environmental Science 65 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 28 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 5%
Engineering 7 2%
Other 15 5%
Unknown 61 22%