↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Impact on Clinical and Cost Outcomes of a Centralized Approach to Acute Stroke Care in London: A Comparative Effectiveness Before and After Model

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Impact on Clinical and Cost Outcomes of a Centralized Approach to Acute Stroke Care in London: A Comparative Effectiveness Before and After Model
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0070420
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachael Maree Hunter, Charles Davie, Anthony Rudd, Alan Thompson, Hilary Walker, Neil Thomson, James Mountford, Lee Schwamm, John Deanfield, Kerry Thompson, Bikash Dewan, Minesh Mistry, Sadik Quoraishi, Stephen Morris

Abstract

In July 2010 a new multiple hub-and-spoke model for acute stroke care was implemented across the whole of London, UK, with continuous specialist care during the first 72 hours provided at 8 hyper-acute stroke units (HASUs) compared to the previous model of 30 local hospitals receiving acute stroke patients. We investigated differences in clinical outcomes and costs between the new and old models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Unknown 96 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 4 4%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 24%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 33 33%