↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

How about Lunch? Consequences of the Meal Context on Cognition and Emotion

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
51 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
How about Lunch? Consequences of the Meal Context on Cognition and Emotion
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0070314
Pubmed ID
Authors

Werner Sommer, Birgit Stürmer, Olga Shmuilovich, Manuel Martin-Loeches, Annekathrin Schacht

Abstract

Although research addresses the effects of a meal's context on food preference, the psychological consequences of meal situations are largely unexplored. We compared the cognitive and emotional effects of a restaurant meal eaten in the company of others to a solitary meal consumed in a plain office using pre- and post-tests analysis and controlling for the kind and amount of food consumed. Three tasks were conducted, measuring: (1) semantic memory (2) cognitive control and error monitoring, and (3) processing of emotional facial expressions. Covert processes in these tasks were assessed with event-related brain potentials. A mood rating questionnaire indicated a relaxation effect of the restaurant as compared to the plain meal situation. The restaurant meal increased sensitivity to threatening facial expressions and diminished cognitive control and error monitoring. No effects were observed for semantic memory. These findings provide the first experimental evidence that a restaurant meal with a social component may be more relaxing than a meal eaten alone in a plain setting and may reduce cognitive control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 93 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 6 6%
Other 23 24%
Unknown 21 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 25 26%