↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Paternity Acknowledgment in 2 Million Birth Records from Michigan

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Paternity Acknowledgment in 2 Million Birth Records from Michigan
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0070042
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas Almond, Maya Rossin-Slater

Abstract

Out-of-wedlock childbearing is more common in the U.S. than in other countries and becoming more so. A growing share of such non-marital births identify the father, which can create a legal entitlement to child support. Relatively little is known about individual determinants of the decision to establish paternity, in part because of data limitations. In this paper, we evaluate all birth records in Michigan from 1993 to 2006, which have been merged to the paternity registry. In 2006, 30,231 Michigan children, almost one quarter of all Michigan births, were born to unmarried mothers and had paternity acknowledged. We find that births with paternity acknowledged have worse outcomes along various health and socio-economic dimensions relative to births to married parents, but better outcomes relative to births to unmarried parents without paternity acknowledgement. Furthermore, unmarried men who father sons are significantly more likely to acknowledge paternity than fathers of daughters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 10%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 29%
Professor 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Psychology 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 43%