↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Connectivity, Not Frequency, Determines the Fate of a Morpheme

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Connectivity, Not Frequency, Determines the Fate of a Morpheme
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0069945
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Barbara Keller, Jörg Schultz

Abstract

Morphemes are the smallest meaningful parts of words and therefore represent a natural unit to study the evolution of words. To analyze the influence of language change on morphemes, we performed a large scale analysis of German and English vocabulary covering the last 200 years. Using a network approach from bioinformatics, we examined the historical dynamics of morphemes, the fixation of new morphemes and the emergence of words containing existing morphemes. We found that these processes are driven mainly by the number of different direct neighbors of a morpheme in words (connectivity, an equivalent to family size or type frequency) and not its frequency of usage (equivalent to token frequency). This contrasts words, whose survival is determined by their frequency of usage. We therefore identified features of morphemes which are not dictated by the statistical properties of words. As morphemes are also relevant for the mental representation of words, this result might enable establishing a link between an individual's perception of language and historical language change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 6%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 5 14%
Professor 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 13 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Linguistics 3 8%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 13 36%