↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

This Examined Life: The Upside of Self-Knowledge for Interpersonal Relationships

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
This Examined Life: The Upside of Self-Knowledge for Interpersonal Relationships
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0069605
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth R. Tenney, Simine Vazire, Matthias R. Mehl

Abstract

Although self-knowledge is an unquestioned good in many philosophical traditions, testing this assumption scientifically has posed a challenge because of the difficulty of measuring individual differences in self-knowledge. In this study, we used a novel, naturalistic, and objective criterion to determine individuals' degree of self-knowledge. Specifically, self-knowledge was measured as the congruence between people's beliefs about how they typically behave and their actual behavior as measured with unobtrusive audio recordings from daily life. We found that this measure of self-knowledge was positively correlated with informants' perceptions of relationship quality. These results suggest that self-knowledge is interpersonally advantageous. Given the importance of relationships for our social species, self-knowledge could have great social value that has heretofore been overlooked.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 2%
Unknown 60 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 57%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 8%
Computer Science 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 11 17%