↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Reduction of the Spatial Stroop Effect by Peripheral Cueing as a Function of the Presence/Absence of Placeholders

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Reduction of the Spatial Stroop Effect by Peripheral Cueing as a Function of the Presence/Absence of Placeholders
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0069456
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chunming Luo, Juan Lupiáñez, María Jesús Funes, Xiaolan Fu

Abstract

In a paradigm combining spatial Stroop with spatial cueing, the current study investigated the role of the presence vs. absence of placeholders on the reduction of the spatial Stroop effect by peripheral cueing. At a short cue-target interval, the modulation of peripheral cueing over the spatial Stroop effect was observed independently of the presence/absence of placeholders. At the long cue-target interval, however, this modulation over the spatial Stroop effect only occurred in the placeholders-present condition. These findings show that placeholders are modulators but not mediators of the reduction of the spatial Stroop effect by peripheral cueing, which further favor the cue-target integration account.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 18%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 32%