↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Vitamin D Supplementation and Breast Cancer Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
31 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin D Supplementation and Breast Cancer Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0069269
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Sperati, Patrizia Vici, Marcello Maugeri-Saccà, Saverio Stranges, Nancy Santesso, Luciano Mariani, Antonio Giordano, Domenico Sergi, Laura Pizzuti, Luigi Di Lauro, Maurizio Montella, Anna Crispo, Marcella Mottolese, Maddalena Barba

Abstract

In recent years, the scientific evidence linking vitamin D status or supplementation to breast cancer has grown notably. To investigate the role of vitamin D supplementation on breast cancer incidence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing vitamin D with placebo or no treatment. We used OVID to search MEDLINE (R), EMBASE and CENTRAL until April 2012. We screened the reference lists of included studies and used the "Related Article" feature in PubMed to identify additional articles. No language restrictions were applied. Two reviewers independently extracted data on methodological quality, participants, intervention, comparison and outcomes. Risk Ratios and 95% Confident Intervals for breast cancer were pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I(2) test. In sensitivity analysis, we assessed the impact of vitamin D dosage and mode of administration on treatment effects. Only two randomized controlled trials fulfilled the pre-set inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis included 5372 postmenopausal women. Overall, Risk Ratios and 95% Confident Intervals were 1.11 and 0.74-1.68. We found no evidence of heterogeneity. Neither vitamin D dosage nor mode of administration significantly affected breast cancer risk. However, treatment efficacy was somewhat greater when vitamin D was administered at the highest dosage and in combination with calcium (Risk Ratio 0.58, 95% Confident Interval 0.23-1.47 and Risk Ratio 0.93, 95% Confident Interval 0.54-1.60, respectively). In conclusions, vitamin D use seems not to be associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer development in postmenopausal women. However, the available evidence is still limited and inadequate to draw firm conclusions. Study protocol code: FARM8L2B5L.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 28 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 9%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 31 24%