↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Evidence That Personal Genome Testing Enhances Student Learning in a Course on Genomics and Personalized Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
122 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Evidence That Personal Genome Testing Enhances Student Learning in a Course on Genomics and Personalized Medicine
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0068853
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keyan Salari, Konrad J. Karczewski, Louanne Hudgins, Kelly E. Ormond

Abstract

An emerging debate in academic medical centers is not about the need for providing trainees with fundamental education on genomics, but rather the most effective educational models that should be deployed. At Stanford School of Medicine, a novel hands-on genomics course was developed in 2010 that provided students the option to undergo personal genome testing as part of the course curriculum. We hypothesized that use of personal genome testing in the classroom would enhance the learning experience of students. No data currently exist on how such methods impact student learning; thus, we surveyed students before and after the course to determine its impact. We analyzed responses using paired statistics from the 31 medical and graduate students who completed both pre-course and post-course surveys. Participants were stratified by those who did (N = 23) or did not (N = 8) undergo personal genome testing. In reflecting on the experience, 83% of students who underwent testing stated that they were pleased with their decision compared to 12.5% of students who decided against testing (P = 0.00058). Seventy percent of those who underwent personal genome testing self-reported a better understanding of human genetics on the basis of having undergone testing. Further, students who underwent personal genome testing demonstrated an average 31% increase in pre- to post-course scores on knowledge questions (P = 3.5×10(-6)); this was significantly higher (P = 0.003) than students who did not undergo testing, who showed a non-significant improvement. Undergoing personal genome testing and using personal genotype data in the classroom enhanced students' self-reported and assessed knowledge of genomics, and did not appear to cause significant anxiety. At least for self-selected students, the incorporation of personal genome testing can be an effective educational tool to teach important concepts of clinical genomic testing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 122 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Finland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 94 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Other 11 11%
Other 29 28%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Computer Science 5 5%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 10 10%