↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Evolution of Plant HECT Ubiquitin Ligases

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Evolution of Plant HECT Ubiquitin Ligases
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0068536
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ignacio Marín

Abstract

HECT ubiquitin ligases are key components of the ubiquitin-proteasome system, which is present in all eukaryotes. In this study, the patterns of emergence of HECT genes in plants are described. Phylogenetic and structural data indicate that viridiplantae have six main HECT subfamilies, which arose before the split that separated green algae from the rest of plants. It is estimated that the common ancestor of all plants contained seven HECT genes. Contrary to what happened in animals, the number of HECT genes has been kept quite constant in all lineages, both in chlorophyta and streptophyta, although evolutionary recent duplications are found in some species. Several of the genes found in plants may have originated very early in eukaryotic evolution, given that they have clear similarities, both in sequence and structure, to animal genes. Finally, in Arabidopsis thaliana, we found significant correlations in the expression patterns of HECT genes and some ancient, broadly expressed genes that belong to a different ubiquitin ligase family, called RBR. These results are discussed in the context of the evolution of the gene families required for ubiquitination in plants.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 3%
Colombia 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 28%
Researcher 9 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 19%
Chemistry 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Unknown 7 19%