↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Quantification of the Early Small-Scale Fishery in the North-Eastern Baltic Sea in the Late 17th Century

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Quantification of the Early Small-Scale Fishery in the North-Eastern Baltic Sea in the Late 17th Century
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0068513
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aare Verliin, Henn Ojaveer, Katre Kaju, Erki Tammiksaar

Abstract

Historical perspectives on fisheries and related human behaviour provide valuable information on fishery resources and their exploitation, helping to more appropriately set management targets and determine relevant reference levels. In this study we analyse historical fisheries and fish trade at the north-eastern Baltic Sea coast in the late 17th century. Local consumption and export together amounted to the annual removal of about 200 tonnes of fish from the nearby sea and freshwater bodies. The fishery was very diverse and exploited altogether one cyclostome and 17 fish species with over 90% of the catch being consumed locally. The exported fish consisted almost entirely of high-valued species with Stockholm (Sweden) being the most important export destination. Due to rich political history and natural features of the region, we suggest that the documented evidence of this small-scale fishery should be considered as the first quantitative summary of exploitation of aquatic living resources in the region and can provide a background for future analyses.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Researcher 3 13%
Unspecified 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 29%
Environmental Science 3 13%
Unspecified 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 38%