↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
28 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
134 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
Title
Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0068397
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Grant Steen, Arturo Casadevall, Ferric C. Fang

Abstract

The number of retracted scientific publications has risen sharply, but it is unclear whether this reflects an increase in publication of flawed articles or an increase in the rate at which flawed articles are withdrawn.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 134 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 3%
Germany 5 1%
Brazil 4 1%
Chile 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Morocco 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 345 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 58 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 15%
Student > Master 52 14%
Student > Bachelor 45 12%
Other 28 7%
Other 92 24%
Unknown 49 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 47 12%
Social Sciences 34 9%
Computer Science 32 8%
Psychology 22 6%
Other 117 31%
Unknown 66 17%