↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Reviewers’ Ratings and Bibliometric Indicators: Hand in Hand When Assessing Over Research Proposals?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Reviewers’ Ratings and Bibliometric Indicators: Hand in Hand When Assessing Over Research Proposals?
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0068258
Pubmed ID
Authors

Álvaro Cabezas-Clavijo, Nicolás Robinson-García, Manuel Escabias, Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras

Abstract

The peer review system has been traditionally challenged due to its many limitations especially for allocating funding. Bibliometric indicators may well present themselves as a complement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 81 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Librarian 10 11%
Student > Master 8 9%
Professor 6 7%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 23 26%
Computer Science 8 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 28 31%