Title |
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Non-Communicable Diseases Prevalence in India: Disparities between Self-Reported Diagnoses and Standardized Measures
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0068219 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sukumar Vellakkal, S. V. Subramanian, Christopher Millett, Sanjay Basu, David Stuckler, Shah Ebrahim |
Abstract |
Whether non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are diseases of poverty or affluence in low-and-middle income countries has been vigorously debated. Most analyses of NCDs have used self-reported data, which is biased by differential access to healthcare services between groups of different socioeconomic status (SES). We sought to compare self-reported diagnoses versus standardised measures of NCD prevalence across SES groups in India. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
Italy | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Cameroon | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 300 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 49 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 15% |
Researcher | 46 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 5% |
Other | 53 | 17% |
Unknown | 75 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 27% |
Social Sciences | 45 | 14% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 24 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
Other | 33 | 11% |
Unknown | 97 | 31% |