↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Suppression of HBV by Tenofovir in HBV/HIV Coinfected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Suppression of HBV by Tenofovir in HBV/HIV Coinfected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0068152
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huw Price, David Dunn, Deenan Pillay, Firouze Bani-Sadr, Theodora de Vries-Sluijs, Mamta K. Jain, Noriyoshi Kuzushita, Stefan Mauss, Marina Núñez, Reto Nüesch, Marion Peters, Thomas Reiberger, Christoph Stephan, Lionel Tan, Richard Gilson

Abstract

Hepatitis B coinfection is common in HIV-positive individuals and as antiretroviral therapy has made death due to AIDS less common, hepatitis has become increasingly important. Several drugs are available to treat hepatitis B. The most potent and the one with the lowest risk of resistance appears to be tenofovir (TDF). However there are several questions that remain unanswered regarding the use of TDF, including the proportion of patients that achieves suppression of HBV viral load and over what time, whether suppression is durable and whether prior treatment with other HBV-active drugs such as lamivudine, compromises the efficacy of TDF due to possible selection of resistant HBV strains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 82 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 26%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 17 20%