↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Balancing Evidence and Uncertainty when Considering Rubella Vaccine Introduction

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Balancing Evidence and Uncertainty when Considering Rubella Vaccine Introduction
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0067639
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin Lessler, C. Jessica E. Metcalf

Abstract

Despite a safe and effective vaccine, rubella vaccination programs with inadequate coverage can raise the average age of rubella infection; thereby increasing rubella cases among pregnant women and the resulting congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) in their newborns. The vaccination coverage necessary to reduce CRS depends on the birthrate in a country and the reproductive number, R0, a measure of how efficiently a disease transmits. While the birthrate within a country can be known with some accuracy, R0 varies between settings and can be difficult to measure. Here we aim to provide guidance on the safe introduction of rubella vaccine into countries in the face of substantial uncertainty in R0.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 78 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Other 7 8%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Mathematics 5 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 20 24%