↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Assessment and Challenges of Ligand Docking into Comparative Models of G-Protein Coupled Receptors

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Assessment and Challenges of Ligand Docking into Comparative Models of G-Protein Coupled Receptors
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0067302
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Dong Nguyen, Christoffer Norn, Thomas M. Frimurer, Jens Meiler

Abstract

The rapidly increasing number of high-resolution X-ray structures of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) creates a unique opportunity to employ comparative modeling and docking to provide valuable insight into the function and ligand binding determinants of novel receptors, to assist in virtual screening and to design and optimize drug candidates. However, low sequence identity between receptors, conformational flexibility, and chemical diversity of ligands present an enormous challenge to molecular modeling approaches. It is our hypothesis that rapid Monte-Carlo sampling of protein backbone and side-chain conformational space with Rosetta can be leveraged to meet this challenge. This study performs unbiased comparative modeling and docking methodologies using 14 distinct high-resolution GPCRs and proposes knowledge-based filtering methods for improvement of sampling performance and identification of correct ligand-receptor interactions. On average, top ranked receptor models built on template structures over 50% sequence identity are within 2.9 Å of the experimental structure, with an average root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 2.2 Å for the transmembrane region and 5 Å for the second extracellular loop. Furthermore, these models are consistently correlated with low Rosetta energy score. To predict their binding modes, ligand conformers of the 14 ligands co-crystalized with the GPCRs were docked against the top ranked comparative models. In contrast to the comparative models themselves, however, it remains difficult to unambiguously identify correct binding modes by score alone. On average, sampling performance was improved by 10(3) fold over random using knowledge-based and energy-based filters. In assessing the applicability of experimental constraints, we found that sampling performance is increased by one order of magnitude for every 10 residues known to contact the ligand. Additionally, in the case of DOR, knowledge of a single specific ligand-protein contact improved sampling efficiency 7 fold. These findings offer specific guidelines which may lead to increased success in determining receptor-ligand complexes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 73 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 26%
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 21 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 17%
Computer Science 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 9 12%