↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Access to Primary Care and Visits to Emergency Departments in England: A Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
74 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Title
Access to Primary Care and Visits to Emergency Departments in England: A Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0066699
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas E. Cowling, Elizabeth V. Cecil, Michael A. Soljak, John Tayu Lee, Christopher Millett, Azeem Majeed, Robert M. Wachter, Matthew J. Harris

Abstract

The number of visits to hospital emergency departments (EDs) in England has increased by 20% since 2007-08, placing unsustainable pressure on the National Health Service (NHS). Some patients attend EDs because they are unable to access primary care services. This study examined the association between access to primary care and ED visits in England. A cross-sectional, population-based analysis of patients registered with 7,856 general practices in England was conducted, for the time period April 2010 to March 2011. The outcome measure was the number of self-referred discharged ED visits by the registered population of a general practice. The predictor variables were measures of patient-reported access to general practice services; these were entered into a negative binomial regression model with variables to control for the characteristics of patient populations, supply of general practitioners and travel times to health services. MAIN RESULT AND CONCLUSION: General practices providing more timely access to primary care had fewer self-referred discharged ED visits per registered patient (for the most accessible quintile of practices, RR = 0.898; P<0.001). Policy makers should consider improving timely access to primary care when developing plans to reduce ED utilisation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 166 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 18%
Student > Master 27 16%
Other 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Other 39 23%
Unknown 26 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Social Sciences 14 8%
Engineering 4 2%
Unspecified 4 2%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 32 19%