↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

A Simple and Computationally Efficient Approach to Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction Analysis of Gene-Gene Interactions for Quantitative Traits

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A Simple and Computationally Efficient Approach to Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction Analysis of Gene-Gene Interactions for Quantitative Traits
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0066545
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiang Gui, Jason H. Moore, Scott M. Williams, Peter Andrews, Hans L. Hillege, Pim van der Harst, Gerjan Navis, Wiek H. Van Gilst, Folkert W. Asselbergs, Diane Gilbert-Diamond

Abstract

We present an extension of the two-class multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) algorithm that enables detection and characterization of epistatic SNP-SNP interactions in the context of a quantitative trait. The proposed Quantitative MDR (QMDR) method handles continuous data by modifying MDR's constructive induction algorithm to use a T-test. QMDR replaces the balanced accuracy metric with a T-test statistic as the score to determine the best interaction model. We used a simulation to identify the empirical distribution of QMDR's testing score. We then applied QMDR to genetic data from the ongoing prospective Prevention of Renal and Vascular End-Stage Disease (PREVEND) study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 29%
Researcher 11 21%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 19%
Computer Science 4 8%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 6 12%