↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

“Like Throwing a Bowling Ball at a Battle Ship” Audience Responses to Australian News Stories about Alcohol Pricing and Promotion Policies: A Qualitative Focus Group Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
“Like Throwing a Bowling Ball at a Battle Ship” Audience Responses to Australian News Stories about Alcohol Pricing and Promotion Policies: A Qualitative Focus Group Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0065261
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea S. Fogarty, Simon Chapman

Abstract

Policies affecting alcohol's price and promotion are effective measures to reduce harms. Yet policies targeting populations are unpopular with the public, whose views can be influenced by news framings of policy narratives. In Australia, alcohol taxation receives high news coverage, while advertising restrictions have not until recently, and narratives are highly contested for each. However, research specifically examining how audiences respond to such news stories is scant. We sought to explore audience understanding of news reports about two alcohol policy proposals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Other 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 20%
Social Sciences 13 19%
Psychology 6 9%
Computer Science 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 24 34%