↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

International Comparisons of Fetal and Neonatal Mortality Rates in High-Income Countries: Should Exclusion Thresholds Be Based on Birth Weight or Gestational Age?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
International Comparisons of Fetal and Neonatal Mortality Rates in High-Income Countries: Should Exclusion Thresholds Be Based on Birth Weight or Gestational Age?
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0064869
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashna D. Mohangoo, Béatrice Blondel, Mika Gissler, Petr Velebil, Alison Macfarlane, Jennifer Zeitlin

Abstract

Fetal and neonatal mortality rates are essential indicators of population health, but variations in recording of births and deaths at the limits of viability compromises international comparisons. The World Health Organization recommends comparing rates after exclusion of births with a birth weight less than 1000 grams, but many analyses of perinatal outcomes are based on gestational age. We compared the effects of using a 1000-gram birth weight or a 28-week gestational age threshold on reported rates of fetal and neonatal mortality in Europe.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 61 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 22 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Psychology 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 23 37%