Title |
Impact of STROBE Statement Publication on Quality of Observational Study Reporting: Interrupted Time Series versus Before-After Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0064733 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sylvie Bastuji-Garin, Emilie Sbidian, Caroline Gaudy-Marqueste, Emilie Ferrat, Jean-Claude Roujeau, Marie-Aleth Richard, Florence Canoui-Poitrine |
Abstract |
In uncontrolled before-after studies, CONSORT was shown to improve the reporting of randomised trials. Before-after studies ignore underlying secular trends and may overestimate the impact of interventions. Our aim was to assess the impact of the 2007 STROBE statement publication on the quality of observational study reporting, using both uncontrolled before-after analyses and interrupted time series. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 66 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 22% |
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Professor | 7 | 10% |
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 21% |
Unknown | 14 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 37% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 19 | 28% |