↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Efficient Control of Epidemics Spreading on Networks: Balance between Treatment and Recovery

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Efficient Control of Epidemics Spreading on Networks: Balance between Treatment and Recovery
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0063813
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katarzyna Oleś, Ewa Gudowska-Nowak, Adam Kleczkowski

Abstract

We analyse two models describing disease transmission and control on regular and small-world networks. We use simulations to find a control strategy that minimizes the total cost of an outbreak, thus balancing the costs of disease against that of the preventive treatment. The models are similar in their epidemiological part, but differ in how the removed/recovered individuals are treated. The differences in models affect choice of the strategy only for very cheap treatment and slow spreading disease. However for the combinations of parameters that are important from the epidemiological perspective (high infectiousness and expensive treatment) the models give similar results. Moreover, even where the choice of the strategy is different, the total cost spent on controlling the epidemic is very similar for both models.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 8%
United States 1 4%
Italy 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 20 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 24%
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Lecturer 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 16%
Mathematics 3 12%
Engineering 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 3 12%