↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Empirical Support for DSM-IV Schizoaffective Disorder: Clinical and Cognitive Validators from a Large Patient Sample

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Empirical Support for DSM-IV Schizoaffective Disorder: Clinical and Cognitive Validators from a Large Patient Sample
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0063734
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pamela DeRosse, Katherine E. Burdick, Todd Lencz, Samuel G. Siris, Anil K. Malhotra

Abstract

The diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder has long maintained an uncertain status in psychiatric nosology. Studies comparing clinical and biological features of patients with schizoaffective disorder to patients with related disorders [e.g., schizophrenia and bipolar disorder] can provide an evidence base for judging the validity of the diagnostic category. However, because most prior studies of schizoaffective disorder have only evaluated differences between groups at a static timepoint, it is unclear how these disorders may be related when the entire illness course is taken into consideration.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 17%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 19%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 31%