↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Pigs and Farm Workers on Conventional and Antibiotic-Free Swine Farms in the USA

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
25 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
Title
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Pigs and Farm Workers on Conventional and Antibiotic-Free Swine Farms in the USA
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0063704
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tara C. Smith, Wondwossen A. Gebreyes, Melanie J. Abley, Abby L. Harper, Brett M. Forshey, Michael J. Male, H. Wayne Martin, Bayleyegn Z. Molla, Srinand Sreevatsan, Siddhartha Thakur, Madhumathi Thiruvengadam, Peter R. Davies

Abstract

Much uncertainty remains about the origin and public health implications of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA). This study aimed to investigate the occurrence and prevalence of MRSA in general and LA-MRSA in particular in pigs and farm workers in five states. We collected nasal swabs from pigs and farm workers at 45 swine herds (21 antibiotic-free herds; 24 conventional herds) in Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, North Carolina and Ohio. MRSA was isolated from 50 of 1085 pigs (4.6%) and 31 of 148 (20.9%) of farm workers. MRSA-positive pigs and people were clustered in four conventional swine farms in Iowa and Illinois. Based on genotyping, spa type t034, a common livestock associated variant, was predominant among both human and swine isolates. These results confirm the presence of LA-MRSA in pigs and swine farm workers in the USA, but the prevalence found is relatively low compared with European studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 217 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 16%
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 46 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 20 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 7%
Environmental Science 16 7%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 56 25%