↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Global Patterns of Evolutionary Distinct and Globally Endangered Amphibians and Mammals

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Global Patterns of Evolutionary Distinct and Globally Endangered Amphibians and Mammals
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0063582
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kamran Safi, Katrina Armour-Marshall, Jonathan E. M. Baillie, Nick J. B. Isaac

Abstract

Conservation of phylogenetic diversity allows maximising evolutionary information preserved within fauna and flora. The "EDGE of Existence" programme is the first institutional conservation initiative that prioritises species based on phylogenetic information. Species are ranked in two ways: one according to their evolutionary distinctiveness (ED) and second, by including IUCN extinction status, their evolutionary distinctiveness and global endangerment (EDGE). Here, we describe the global patterns in the spatial distribution of priority ED and EDGE species, in order to identify conservation areas for mammalian and amphibian communities. In addition, we investigate whether environmental conditions can predict the observed spatial pattern in ED and EDGE globally.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 8 3%
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 289 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 18%
Researcher 54 17%
Student > Bachelor 31 10%
Other 17 5%
Other 48 15%
Unknown 50 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 142 45%
Environmental Science 71 22%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 2%
Other 18 6%
Unknown 56 18%