↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Database Citation in Full Text Biomedical Articles

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
5 blogs
twitter
8 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
Database Citation in Full Text Biomedical Articles
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0063184
Pubmed ID
Authors

Şenay Kafkas, Jee-Hyub Kim, Johanna R. McEntyre

Abstract

Molecular biology and literature databases represent essential infrastructure for life science research. Effective integration of these data resources requires that there are structured cross-references at the level of individual articles and biological records. Here, we describe the current patterns of how database entries are cited in research articles, based on analysis of the full text Open Access articles available from Europe PMC. Focusing on citation of entries in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA), UniProt and Protein Data Bank, Europe (PDBe), we demonstrate that text mining doubles the number of structured annotations of database record citations supplied in journal articles by publishers. Many thousands of new literature-database relationships are found by text mining, since these relationships are also not present in the set of articles cited by database records. We recommend that structured annotation of database records in articles is extended to other databases, such as ArrayExpress and Pfam, entries from which are also cited widely in the literature. The very high precision and high-throughput of this text-mining pipeline makes this activity possible both accurately and at low cost, which will allow the development of new integrated data services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Kenya 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 59 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 22%
Librarian 8 12%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 21 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 29%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 10 15%