↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Improvements to Robotics-Inspired Conformational Sampling in Rosetta

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Improvements to Robotics-Inspired Conformational Sampling in Rosetta
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0063090
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amelie Stein, Tanja Kortemme

Abstract

To accurately predict protein conformations in atomic detail, a computational method must be capable of sampling models sufficiently close to the native structure. All-atom sampling is difficult because of the vast number of possible conformations and extremely rugged energy landscapes. Here, we test three sampling strategies to address these difficulties: conformational diversification, intensification of torsion and omega-angle sampling and parameter annealing. We evaluate these strategies in the context of the robotics-based kinematic closure (KIC) method for local conformational sampling in Rosetta on an established benchmark set of 45 12-residue protein segments without regular secondary structure. We quantify performance as the fraction of sub-Angstrom models generated. While improvements with individual strategies are only modest, the combination of intensification and annealing strategies into a new "next-generation KIC" method yields a four-fold increase over standard KIC in the median percentage of sub-Angstrom models across the dataset. Such improvements enable progress on more difficult problems, as demonstrated on longer segments, several of which could not be accurately remodeled with previous methods. Given its improved sampling capability, next-generation KIC should allow advances in other applications such as local conformational remodeling of multiple segments simultaneously, flexible backbone sequence design, and development of more accurate energy functions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Italy 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 154 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 31%
Researcher 35 22%
Student > Master 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 15 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 23%
Chemistry 19 12%
Computer Science 18 11%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 18 11%