Title |
Evolvability Is Inevitable: Increasing Evolvability without the Pressure to Adapt
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0062186 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joel Lehman, Kenneth O. Stanley |
Abstract |
Why evolvability appears to have increased over evolutionary time is an important unresolved biological question. Unlike most candidate explanations, this paper proposes that increasing evolvability can result without any pressure to adapt. The insight is that if evolvability is heritable, then an unbiased drifting process across genotypes can still create a distribution of phenotypes biased towards evolvability, because evolvable organisms diffuse more quickly through the space of possible phenotypes. Furthermore, because phenotypic divergence often correlates with founding niches, niche founders may on average be more evolvable, which through population growth provides a genotypic bias towards evolvability. Interestingly, the combination of these two mechanisms can lead to increasing evolvability without any pressure to out-compete other organisms, as demonstrated through experiments with a series of simulated models. Thus rather than from pressure to adapt, evolvability may inevitably result from any drift through genotypic space combined with evolution's passive tendency to accumulate niches. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 41% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
Norway | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Comoros | 1 | 5% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 77% |
Scientists | 5 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Hungary | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 2% |
Unknown | 160 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 23% |
Researcher | 34 | 19% |
Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 6% |
Other | 40 | 22% |
Unknown | 17 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 39% |
Computer Science | 41 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 8% |
Engineering | 8 | 4% |
Psychology | 4 | 2% |
Other | 20 | 11% |
Unknown | 22 | 12% |